Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00919
Original file (BC 2014 00919.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00919
			COUNSEL:  NONE
			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release of Discharge from Active 
Duty be updated to reflect “Operation DESERT STORM/SHIELD 
campaign badge Was Authorized” and he receive an updated DD Form 
214.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His DD Form 214 should be updated in Block 13 or 18 to reflect 
that he served during Operation DESERT STORM/SHIELD when a 
campaign badge was authorized.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 5 Jun 96, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force 

The applicant’s DD Form 214, reflects that he served from 6 Jun 
96 to 1 Apr 97 in support of Operation DESERT STORM/SHIELD.

On 10 Apr 97, the applicant received a general (under honorable 
conditions) discharge.  He was credited with 10 months and 6 
days of active service.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM states they cannot make a determination as to whether 
the applicant should or should not be awarded the Campaign Badge 
for Operation DESERT STORM/SHIELD.  They are not the proper 
approving authority for campaign badges; rather the Awards and 
Decoration Branch should be contacted.    

The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to have 
an Operation DESERT STORM/SHIELD Campaign Badge included on his 
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, indicating he failed to provide evidence the DD Form 
214 was prepared in error.

The governing directive for the DD Form 214 is AFI 36-3202, 
Separation Documents.  It authorizes the listing of decorations, 
unit awards, badges and service awards that are authorized for 
wear in uniform by Air Force members.  There is not an Operation 
DESERT STORM/SHIELD Campaign Badge authorized in the inventory 
for wear by active Air Force personnel.

The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

He states he is not requesting to obtain a Campaign Badge for 
Operation DESERT STORM/SHIELD, but is requesting the 
comments/remarks on his DD Form 214, be updated to reflect that 
he served in Support of Operation DESERT STORM/SHIELD during a 
time when a campaign badge was authorized.  He is not requesting 
a Campaign Badge that is not authorized for wear.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit E.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We note 
that DPSOR recommends denial for award of a campaign badge.  
However, we note that the applicant is actually requesting that 
his DD Form 214 be amended to include a statement that he served 
in support of Operation DESERT STORM/SHIELD during a time when a 
campaign badge was authorized.  After thoroughly reviewing the 
applicant’s appeal, we find no error or injustice in the way his 
DD Form 214 was prepared.  Therefore, we conclude the applicant 
has failed to provide any evidence showing that he has been the 
victim of an error or injustice.  In view of the above and in 
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon 
which to favorably consider this application.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-00919 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 1 Mar 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 11 Mar 14.
	Exhibit D.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 29 Apr 14
	Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 May 14.
	Exhibit F.  Applicant’s rebuttal, dated 17 Jun 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00721

    Original file (BC-2012-00721.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 Sep 12, AFPC/DPSOR notified the applicant that IAW AFI 36- 3202, Separation Documents they cannot add the statement “Vietnam Era Veteran” to his DD Form 214; however, his Kuwait Liberation Medal has been amended to read Kuwait Liberation Medal-Kuwait (KLM-K) and will be administratively corrected. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his name in his military personnel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03154

    Original file (BC-2011-03154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the award of the SAEMR, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05893

    Original file (BC 2013 05893.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C through F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/A3O-AIF recommends granting the Aircrew Member Badge. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice regarding the applicant’s request that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect the award of the Missile...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01547

    Original file (BC 2014 01547.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01547 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following Air Force Occupational Badge, Qualification Badge, and Medals: a. Combat Crewmember Qualification Badge c. Bosnia Combat Medal d. Croatia Combat Medal e. Serbia Combat Medal f. North Atlantic Treaty...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00543

    Original file (BC 2014 00543.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00543 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to reflect the following awards: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which are included at Exhibit C. AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04799

    Original file (BC-2011-04799.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM) is awarded to Service members that must have been permanently assigned, attached, or detailed to a unit that operated within the area or eligibility (AOE) for 30 consecutive days or for 60 non-consecutive days on or after 19 Mar 03 to a future date to be determined (TBD) by the Secretary of Defense. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01949

    Original file (BC-2011-01949.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01949 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected as follows: 1) Block 12c, Record of Service - Net Active Service this Period; to reflect 10 years, 0 months, 14 days, rather than, 9 years, 8 months, and 15 days. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01989

    Original file (BC 2014 01989.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends the Board make a determination if the applicant served in the area of eligibility for award of the AFEM. While we note the comments of DPSID indicating the applicant’s records do not contain documentation verifying the exact location served for the requested award, we believe Special Order TE-043, dated 30 Jan 96 indicating Operation DESERT STORM, was more likely than not in support...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03532

    Original file (BC 2014 03532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The AFAM was authorized by the Secretary of the Air Force on 12 Oct 80 and is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States and foreign military personnel, below the rank of Colonel, after 30 Sep 80 who while serving in any capacity with the United States Air Force, distinguish themselves by meritorious service or achievement. After a thorough review of the applicant’s official military personnel records, they were unable to verify award of the AFAM. Therefore, we recommend...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05642

    Original file (BC 2012 05642.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was awarded the Elementary Excellence in Competition Rifleman Badge while he was stationed in Panama, but the badge is not reflected in his records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR...